Evaluation of the Actor’s Network of Traditional Herbal Seller and Medicinal Plant Sellers in Iran (Case Study: Alborz Province)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Imam Higher Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education, Extension and Research Organization, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Medicinal plants have played a fundamental role in the health of society in the distant past, but today people's tendency toward these herbals has increased due to the cost and side effects. Therefore, it is essential to supply the market demand for medicinal plants. Traditional herbal seller and medicinal plant sellers have an influential place in the supply chain of medicinal plants, and proper communication of this group facilitates the supply of these plants. This research was conducted to evaluate the network of traditional herbal seller and medicinal plant sellers in Alborz province. The statistical population was all groceries and medicinal plant sellers in Alborz province (N=250). Sampling method was random sampling. Also sample size determined by Krejcie & Morgan table. The number of samples was obtained 130, which by the data was gathered. The research tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. USINET6 and SPSS22 software programs were used to analyze the network of traditional herbal seller and medicinal plant sellers. According to the network analysis results, traditional herbal seller and medicinal plant sellers interact and communicate more with suppliers of unions and guilds, other sellers, marketers, and traditional medicine experts. Also, Medicinal plant business networks, sellers, unions, guilds, suppliers, and processors have more mediating power in the network. The traditional herbal seller and medicinal plant sellers are a central activist in the business network of medicinal plants. The reciprocity index of links showed that this index is in the average range; thus, the network stability is in the average range. The degree of input and output of the model also showed that medicinal herb sellers and traditional herbal seller, major suppliers, and medicinal herb unions and guilds are in network’s center. From this, it can be concluded that these actors in the network have high control and mediation power in the network. Also, exploratory factor analysis showed that the main components of the model are: cooperation and partnership network, information, communication, network formation and development measures, network organization, evaluation and follow-up of activities, marketing and sales.

Keywords

References

  1. Yesilada E. Past and future contributions to traditional medicine in the health care system of the Middle-East. Journal of Ethno pharmacology. 2005; 100:135-147.
  2. Yang Y., Guan J., Yin J., Shao B., Li H. Urinary levels of bisphenol analogues in residents living near a manufacturing plant in south China. Chemosphere. 2014; 112:481-486.
  3. Ford D., Håkansson H. Competition in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management. 2013; 42:1017-24.
  4. Larsen H.O., Smith P.D., Olsen C.S. Nepal's conservation policy options for commercial medicinal plant harvesting: stakeholder views. Oryx. 2005; 39:435-441.
  5. Sefidkon, F. A national approach to change the economic value of medicinal plants in Iran, 2022; 6:135
  6. Welz A.N., Emberger-Klein A., Menrad K. Why people use herbal medicine: insights from a focus-group study in Germany. BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2018 Dec;18(1):1-9.
  7. Kashafi Bonab A. Relative economic advantage of cultivation and trade of medicinal plants in Iran and its value in global markets. J Business Studies. 2009; 44: 67-78
  8. Molkara M. Investigating the export value of Iranian medicinal plants in world trade, Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting. 2020;3:92-98
  9. Kalogiannidis S., Papaevangelou O. Impact of Business Communication on the Performance of Adult Trainees. International J Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 2020; 9:213-220.
  10. Bovee, C.L., Thill, J.V., Raina R.L. Business communication today. Pearson Education India, 2016; 13:210-222.
  11. Thompson J.L., Martin F. Strategic management: Awareness, analysis and change. Cengage Learning (formerly Thomson Learning). 2005;205-208
  12. Manello A., Cisi M., Devicienti F., Vannoni D. Networking: a business for women. Small Business Economics. 2020; 55:329-48.
  13. Holmqvist J., Diaz Ruiz C. Service ecosystems, markets and business networks: What is the difference? A horizontal literature review. The TQM J. 2017 9;29(6):800-810.
  14. Eisenman L.T. Self-determination interventions: Building a foundation for school completion. Remedial and special education. 2007; 28(1):2-8.
  15. Ford D., Mouzas S. Networking under uncertainty: Concepts and research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management. 2010 Aug 1; 39(6):956-62.
  16. Ford D., Gadde L.E., Håkansson H., Lundgren A., Shenota I., Turnbull P., Wilson D. Managing business relationships. 1998;15-20
  17. Håkansson H., Kraus K., Lind J. Accounting in networks as a new research field. InAccounting in networks. 2010, pp. 15-27. Routledge.
  18. Henneberg S.C., Naudé P., Mouzas S. Sense-making and management in business networks-some observations, considerations, and a research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management. 2010; 39:355-360.
  19. Dyer J.H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter organizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review. 1998; 23:660-679.
  20. Gulati R., Higgins M.C. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of inter organizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic management J. 2003; 24:127-144.
  21. Zaheer A., Bell G.G. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic management J. 2005; 26:809-25.
  22. Watson J. Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance. J business venturing. 2007; 22:852-874.
  23. Cisi, M., Devicienti, F.S.M., Manello, A., Vannoni D, The impact of formal networking on the performance of SMEs Academy of Management Review. 2016; 23:660–679
  24. Huxham C., Vangen S. What makes partnerships work? In Public-private partnerships, Routledge. 2000: 23:311-328.
  25. Granovetter M. Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta sociological. 1992; 35:3-11.
  26. Tjosvold, D. (1986). The dynamics of interdependence in organizations. Human Relations, 39(6), 517-540.
  27. Scott J. Corporate business and capitalist classes. OUP Oxford; 1997:6.
  28. Van de Vrande V., De Jong J.P., Vanhaverbeke W., De Rochemont M. Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation. 2009; 29:423-37.
  29. Löpez B.C., Dívid K.M., Crockard H.A. Inadequate PAX-1 gene expression as a cause of agenesis of the thoracolumbar spine with failure of segmentation: Case report. J Neurosurgery. 1997; 86:1018-21.
  30. Valeri M. Networking and cooperation practices in the Italian tourism business. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing. 2016; 2(2):30-35.
  31. Mohammadzadeh SH., Karbasi A.R., Mohammadi H. Factors Affecting the Selection of Strategies for Entering the Foreign Market of Medicinal Plants. 2018: 32(40):185-197
  32. Abedini A., Irani H.R., Yazdani HR, The Problems of the Distribution Channel of Herbal Medicine from the Consumers’ Health Information Management. 2019;16:65-72
  33. Porjam A., Natghi S. The effect of network formation on the performance of tourism businesses (Case of study: tourism agencies active in Tehran), Tourism and leisure. 2016:5 (8)
  34. Alizadeh R., Hosseininia Gh.H., Taghipourian M.J. Conceptualization of Networking in Home-based Businesses based on Agricultural Products with a Qualitative Approach. 2021;52:343-353
  35. Maghsoudi Ganjeh Y., Khani N., Alem Tabriz A., Networking Capability, Business Networks Structure, and Commercialization Performance in Knowledge-Based Companies (Case Study: Isfahan Province Knowledge-Based Companies), journal of technology development and management. 2020,7:151-180
  36. Aaboen L., Laage-Hellman J., Lind F., Öberg C., Shih T. Exploring the roles of university spin-offs in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management. 2016; 59:157-66.
  37. Hosseinpour M., jamshidi, M.J., karimi H Bakhsham, M Designing the Pattern of Factors Affecting the Success of Small and Medium Enterprises Using a Structural Interpretive Approach. 2020;4894-118
  38. Massaro M., Moro A., Aschauer E., Fink M. Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks. Review of Managerial Science. 2019; 13:267-301.
  39. Huovinen P. Advancing networking-based business management in construction markets. In10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, Emerald Publishing Limited. 2019, 41-47
  40. Tura N., Hanski J., Ahola T., Ståhle M., Piiparinen S., Valkokari P. Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers. J cleaner production. 2019; 212:90-98.
  41. Palalić R., Ramadani V., Welsh D.H., Dizdarević A., Ðilović A. Impact of networking and business environment on student leadership styles. International Entrepreneurship and Management J. 2021; 17(1):447-475.
  42. Kalantari KH. Data processing and analysis in socio-economic research using SPSS Software. 2015, Farhang Saba, pp.179-181.
Journal of Medicinal plants and By-product
Volume 13, Issue 1
March 2024
Pages 67-77

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics