The Seed Priming using Putrescine Improves, Germination Indices and Seedlings morphobiochemical Responses of Indigo (Indigofera tinctoria) under Salinity Stress

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

2 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran.

3 Department of Medicinal and aromatic Plants, Shahid Bakeri High Education Center of Miandoab, Urmia University, Iran

Abstract

This research was done as a factorial experiment with 5 replications was carried out. The seeds were primed using putrescine at concentrations of 0 (hydropriming), 0.5, and 1 mM, and control were used as control. Salinity treatment was applied under normal, low, moderate and severe (0, 50, 100, and 150 mM NaCl, respectively) salinity stress. According to the findings, increasing salinity levels reduced germination percentage, (GP), germination rate, (GR), coefficient of velocity of germination, (CVG), seed weight vigour index, (SWVI), by 29, 66, 53 and 25%, respectively and seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, roots length and shoot length by 37, 14, 72 and 61%, respectively, while increasing mean germination time (MGT), percentage of dry matter, total soluble sugar (TSS), reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA) by 112, 53, 57,16 and 182%, respectively. When seeds were primed using putrescine reduced the effects of oxidative stress by reducing ROS and MDA levels by 11 and 47%, respectively compared to control and improved the GP, GR, CVG, SWVI, root length and shoot length by 31, 81, 67, 36, 27, 19%, and decreased MGT by 40%. Although seed priming using 1 mM putrescine was effective in some parameters, there was no significant difference when compared to 0.5 mM putrescine. As a result, seed priming indigo using 0.5 mM putrescine with increasing dry matter by 73% appears to be more practical and economical in terms of mitigating the negative effects of salinity stress.

Keywords

References

  1. Salek Mearaji H., Tavakoli A, Ghanimati S, Kathyrlo P. The effect of salinity stress on traits related to Chenopodium quinoa germination. Plant Ecol. 2019;15:59-69.
  2. Ganjali A.R., Ajorlo M., Khaksafidi A. The effect of drought and salinity stress on seed germination of (Alyssum homalocarpum). J. Crop Breed. 2017;21:133-146.
  3. Tania S.S., Rhaman M.S., Hossain M.M. Hydro-priming and halo-priming improve seed germination, yield and yield contributing characters of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Trop Plant Res. 2020;7:86–93.
  4. Zhu ZH., Sami A., Xu Q Q, Wu L.L., Zheng W.Y., Chen Z.P., Jin X.Z., Zhang H., Li Y., Yu Y. Effects of seed priming treatments on the germination and development of two rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) varieties under the co-influence of low temperature and drought. PLos One. 2021;16, e0257236.
  5. Rhaman M.S., Imran S., Rauf F., Khatun M., Baskin C.C., Murata Y., Hasanuzzaman M. Seed priming with phytohormones: An effective approach for the mitigation of abiotic stress. Plant. 2021;10:37.
  6. Mousavi S.M., Omidi H., Mousavi S.A. The effect of biological pretreatments on growth and physiological germination indicators of fenugreek seedlings under natural salinity stress. Iran seed sci technol. 2022;11:117-145.
  7. Khodabakhshi L., Seyedi A., Mazaheri-Tirani M., Parsa Motlagh B. Morphological and physiological responses of Indigofera tinctoria L. to putrescine under drought stress. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2023;70:1-22.
  8. Bahrasemani S., Seyedi A., Fathi SH., Jowkar M. Improvement of germination indices and morphophysiological characteristics of indigo seedlings due to priming of seeds with pistachio wood vinegar under salinity stress. Iran J Plant Biolog. 2023; Accepted.
  9. Salimi H., Ghorbani M. A study on seed germination of Avena ludoviciana and the effective factors in seed dormancy breaking, Bot J Iran. 2001;2:37-40.
  10. Ranal M.A., De Santana D.G. How and why to measure the germination process? Revista Brasil, Botani. 2006;29:1-11.
  11. Khajeh-Hosseini M., Lomholt A., Matthews S. Mean germination timein the laboratory estimates the relative vigour and field performance of commercial seed lots of maize (Zea mays L.). Seed Sci Technol. 2009;37:446-456.
  12. Albalasmeh A.A., Berhe A.A.., Ghezzehei T.A. A new method for rapid determination of carbohydrate and total carbon concentrations using UV spectrophotometry. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;97:253-261.
  13. Heath R.L., Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;125:189-198.
  14. Zeid I.M. Responses of been (Phaseolus vulgaris) to exogenous putrescine treatment under salinity stress. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2004;7:219-225.
  15. Aslani L., Mobli M., Soleimani M. The effect of different concentrations of spermidine on seed germination of three cultivars of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) at low temperature. Ira Seed Res J. 2014;2:53-64.
  16. Elkaco E. Osmo- and hydropriming enhance germination rate and reduce thermal time requirement of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Winner) seeds. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi. 2014;3:1-12.
  17. Hossinifarahi M, Moazen H.A., Amiri A., Jowkar M.M., Mottaghipisheh J. Evaluation of seed priming and culture media to improve the germination performance and quality of sweet pepper and eggplant seedlings. Int J Hortic Sci Techno. 2022;l9:415-428.
  18. Nascimento W.M., West SH. Muskmelon transplant production in response to seed priming. Horti technol. 1999;9:35-55.
  19. Farsaraei S., Mehdizadeh L., Moghaddam M. Seed priming with putrescine alleviated salinity stress during germination and seedling growth of medicinal pumpkin. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21:1782–1792.
  20. Malik J.A., AlQarawi A.A., AlZain MN, Dar BA, Habib MM, Ibrahim SNS. Effect of salinity and temperature on the seed germination and seedling growth of desert forage grass lasiurus scindicus henr. Sustainability. 2022;14:8387.
  21. Çirka M., Kaya A.R., Eryiğit T. Influence of temperature and salinity stress on germination and seedling growth of soybean (Glycine max L.). Legum Res seed. 2021;44:1053-1059.
  22. Aydin M., Hossein Pur A., Haliloglu K., Tosun M. Effect of putrescine application and drought stress on germination of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agric Facult. 2015;46:43-55.
  23. Afzal I., Rauf S., Basra S.M.A., Murtaza G. Halopriming improves vigor, metabolism of reserves and ionic contents in wheat seedlings under salt stress. Plant Soil Environ, 2008;54:382–388.
  24. Guo R., Yang Z., Li F., Yan C., Zhong X., Liu Q., Xia X., Li H., Zhao L. Comparative metabolic responses and adaptive strategies of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to salt and alkali stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:170.
  25. Quinet M, Ndayiragije A, Lefevre I, Lambillotte B, Dupont-Gillain C.C., Lutts S. Putrescine differently influences the effect of salt stress on polyamine metabolism and ethylene synthesis in rice cultivars differing in salt resistance. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:2719–2733.
  26. García-Caparrós P., Teresa Lao M. The effects of salt stress on ornamental plants and integrative cultivation practices. Sci Hort. 2018;240:430-439.
  27. Bartels D., Sunkar R. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2005;24:23–58.
  28. Gupta B., Huang B. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int J Genomics. 2014;701596.
  29. Karimian Z, Samiei L. Mitigation of salt stress by mycorrhizal inoculation on Nitraria schoberi as a native landscape plant in the arid regions. Desert. 2021;26:16-27.
  30. Hasanuzzaman M., Nahar K., Fujita M. Plant response to salt stress and role of exogenous protectants to mitigate salt-induced damages. Ecophysiology and responses of plants under salt stress. 2013;25–87.
  31. Farooq M., Hussain M., Wakeel A., Siddique KH.M. Salt stress in maize effects resistance mechanisms and management: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2015; 35: 461–48.
  32. Kurek K., Plitta-Michalak B., Ratajczak E. Reactive oxygen species as potential drivers of the seed aging process. Plants Basel. 2019;8:174.
  33. Considine M.J., Foyer CH. Stress effects on the reactive oxygen species-dependent regulation of plant growth and development. J Exp Bot. 2021;72:5795–5806.
  34. Sachdev S., Ansari S.A., Ansari M.I., Fujita M., Hasanuzzan M. Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: generation, signaling, and defense mechanisms. Antioxidunts. 2021;10:277.
  35. Ebrahimi A., Naqvi M.R., Sabokdast M. Comparison of different species of barely landraces in terms of chlorophyll, carotenoids, protein and enzyme. Crop Sci. 2010;41:57-65.
  36. Zou P., Li K., Liu S., He X., Zhang X., Xing R., Li P. Effect of sulfated chitooligosaccharides on wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress. J Agri Food Chem. 2016;64:2815–2821.
  37. Gill S.S., Tuteja N. Polyamines and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5:26–33.
Journal of Medicinal plants and By-Products
Volume 13, Issue 1
March 2024
Pages 179-188

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics