The Effect of Biostimulants based on Free Amino Acids on some Growth and Physiological Parameters of Dracocephalum moldavica L. under Salinity Stress

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

2 Department of Medicinal and aromatic Plants, Shahid Bakeri High Education Center of Miandoab, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

In arid and semi-arid areas salinity reduces agricultural productivity. Biostimulants based on amino acids promote plant growth and yield while significantly reducing abiotic stresses-related injuries. As a result, current study assessed the effect of biostimulants based on free amino acids on Moldavian balm under salinity stress. A factorial experiment using a randomized complete block design with three replications was done. The plants were imposed with four levels of salinity (0, 20, 40 and 60 mM NaCl) and were treated using four formulations of amino acids (Kadostim, Fosnutren, Humiforte and Aminolforte). The results revealed that increasing the salinity level significantly reduced growth parameters such as fresh and dry weight of biomass, root length, shoot length, secondary branch length, crown diameter, internode number, internode length, secondary branch number, leaf number and biochemical parameters such as RWC, chlorophyll a, b, total and carotenoids while increased some osmolytes such as soluble sugar and proline in root and shoot. Leaf spraying of the bio-stimulates based on amino acids, significantly improved the negative effects of salinity stress on growth and biochemical parameters in Moldavian balm, and among them Kadostim had the most significantly positive effects on morphological and biochemical parameters and followed by Aminolforte. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Caporale F., Mateo-Martín J., Usman M.F., Smith-Hall C. Plant-Based sustainable development—the expansion and anatomy of the medicinal plant secondary processing sector in Nepal. Sustainability 2020; 12(14): 5575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145575.
  2. Bisht N., Chauhan P.S. Excessive and disproportionate use of chemicals cause soil contamination and nutritional stress. Soil contamination. Threats and sustainable solutions. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen. 94593.
  3. Popko M., Michalak I., Wilk R., Gramza M., Chojnacka K., Górecki H. Effect of the new plant growth biostimulants based on amino acids on yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Molecules 2018; 23(2): 470 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules 23020470.
  4. Khan S., Yu H., Li Q., Gao Y., Sallam B.N., Wang H., Liu P., Jiang W. Exogenous application of amino acids improves the growth and yield of lettuce by enhancing photosynthetic assimilation and nutrient availability. Agronomy. 2019; 9(5):266. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9050266
  5. Schmiermund T. Organic Nitrogen Compounds. In: The Chemistry Knowledge for Firefighters. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64423-2_47.
  6. Yang Q., Zhao D., Liu Q. Connections between amino acid metabolisms in plants: lysine as an example. Front. Plant Sci. 2020; 11:928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00928.
  7. Ganbari Torkamany L., Mahdavikia H., Rezaei-Chiyaneh E., Barin M., Battaglia M.L. Phytochemical and morphological features of Moldavian balm (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum L.) in intercropping and pure stand cultivation systems and with different fertilizer sources. Inter. J. Hort. Sci. Tech. 2023; 10(3):237-256. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJHST.2022.334222.519.
  8. Ritchie S.W., Nguyen H.T, Holaday A.S. Leaf water content and gas-exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Science. 1990. 105-111. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci 1990.0011183X003000010025x
  9. Arnon D.I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 1949; 24; 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1.
  10. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Roberts PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Annal Chemist. 1956; 28: 350–356. http:/doi.org/10.1038/168167a0.
  11. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973; 39: 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060.
  12. García-Sánchez F., Simón-Grao S., Navarro-Pérez V., Alfosea-Simón M. Scientific Advances in Biostimulation Reported in the 5th Biostimulant World Congress. Horticulturae. 2022; 8: 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ horticulturae8070665.
  13. Chen G., Li Y., Jin C., Wang J., Wang L., Wu J. Physiological and Morphological Responses of Hydroponically Grown Pear Rootstock Under Phosphorus Treatment. Front. Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 696045. https:// doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2021.696045.
  14. Chaski C., Petropoulos S.A. The effects of biostimulant application on growth parameters of lettuce plants grown under deficit irrigation conditions. Biol. Life Sci. Forum. 2022; 16: 4. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/IECHo2022-12499.
  15. Lauren AEE, Praveen S. Auxin driven indoleamine biosynthesis and the role of tryptophan as an inductive signal in Hypericum perforatum (L.). PLoS One. 2019, 14, 10 e0223878.
  16. Shehata S.A., Gharib A.A., Mohamed M El-Mogy, Abdel Gawad K.F., Emad Shalaby A. Influence of compost, amino and humic acids on the growth, yield and chemical parameters of strawberries. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2011; 5(11): 2304-2308.
  17. Azarpira E., Fathi SH., Sharafi Y., Najafian SH. Effect of some amino acids based biostimulants on Medicinal Mint (Mentha spicat L.) under salinity stress. Horticultural Plant Nutrition 2018; 2(2): 154-173. https:// doi.org/ 10.22070/HPN.2020.5012.1068. (In Persian).
  18. Nahed G., Abdel Aziz A., Mazher A.M., Farahat M.M. Response of vegetative growth and chemical constituents of Thuja orientalis L. plant to foliar application of different amino acids at Nubaria. The Journal of American Science. 2010; 6 (3): 295 - 301. http://www.americanscience.org
  19. Dos Santos T.B., Ribas A.F., de Souza S.GH., Budzinski I.G.F., Domingues D.S. Physiological responses to drought, salinity, and heat stress in plants: A Review. Stresses 2022; 2: 113 –135. https:// doi.org/10.3390/stresses2010009.
  20. Sherin G., Aswathi K.P.R., Puthur J.T. Photosynthetic functions in plants subjected to stresses are positively influenced by priming, Plant Stress. 2022; 4:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100079.
  21. Taïbi KH, Taïbi F, Ait Abderrahim L,  Ennajah A. Belkhodja M,  Mulet JM> Effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defense systems in Phaseolus vulgaris L. South African Journal of Botany 2016; 105: 306-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.03.011.
  22. Forde B.G., Lea P.J. Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signaling. Journal of Experimental Botany 2007; 58: (9) 2339–2358. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm121.
  23. Faten, S., Abd El-Aal, F.S., Shaheen, A.M., Ahmed, A.A. and Mahmoud, A.R. 2010. Effect of foliar application of urea and amino acids mixtures as antioxidants on growth, yield and characteristics of squash. Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 6: 583-588.
  24. Movahhedi Dehnavi M., Zarei T., Khajeeyan R., Merajipoor M. Drought and Salinity Impacts on Bread Wheat in a Hydroponic Culture: A Physiological Comparison. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding 2017: 7(1): 61-74.
  25. Khodabakhshi L., Seyedi A., Mazaheri-Tiranic M., Parsa Motlagha B. Morphological and physiological responses of Indigofera tinctoria L. to putrescine under drought stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 2023; 70(3): 1-22.
  26. Hosseinifard M., Stefaniak S., Ghorbani Javid M., Soltani E., Wojtyla L., Garnczarska M. Contribution of Exogenous Proline to Abiotic Stresses Tolerance in Plants: A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022; 23(9): 5186-5200.