Quantification of Individual and Interactive Effects of Some Antioxidants on Drought Tolerance in Cuminum cyminum L.

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

The growth and metabolism of plants are significantly affected by primary abiotic stresses such as heat and drought. The interplay between antioxidants and plant drought tolerance is documented excellently. However, conventional techniques, including correlation analysis, are insufficient for elucidating the relationship between antioxidants and biomass content. This study aimed to assess the individual and interactive impacts of six antioxidants on cumin biomass content through non-linear multiple regression analysis. Field experiments were carried out at two sites in Iran in 2020. The experimental treatments included a factorial split-plot arrangement of magnetic water (conventional and magnetized waters), deficit irrigation at 100%, 70%, and 40% of water requirement, and superabsorbent at 0, 100, and 200 kg/ha, resulting in diverse trait variations. The findings indicate the harmful effects of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) on biomass content. However, anthocyanins partially mitigated their adverse impacts, showing a synergistic promotion of biomass content when combined with anthocyanins, SOD, and CAT. Carotenoids did not individually favor biomass content; however, their interactions with SOD and anthocyanins prompted biomass content. Regarding influencing biomass content, the antioxidants demonstrated the following impact in descending order: peroxidase (POD), anthocyanins, carotenoids, proline, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT). The estimated optimal activities or concentrations of antioxidants, derived from maximizing the regression function, resulted in a 12% increase in biomass content, offering potential applications in breeding programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Tahir H.U., Sarfraz R.A., Ashraf A., Adil S. Chemical composition and antidiabetic activity of essential oils obtained from two spices (Syzygium aromaticum and Cuminum cyminum). International J. Food Properties. 2016; 19: 2156–2164.
  2. Sheikholeslami M.A., Parvardeh S., Ghafghazi S., Samadi S., Poul Y.K., Pouriran R., Amiri S. Antinociceptive and antineuropathic effects of cuminaldehyde, the major constituent of Cuminum cyminum seeds: Possible mechanisms of action. J. Ethnopharmacology. 2020; 255: 112786.
  3. Agarwal U., Pathak D.P., Kapoor G., Bhutani R., Roper R., Gupta V., Kant R. Review on Cuminum cyminum–Nature's magical seeds. J. Chem. Pharmaceutical Res. 2017;9(9): 180–187.
  4. Al-Snafi A.E. The pharmacological activities of Cuminum cyminum: A review. IOSR J. Pharmacy. 2016;6(6): 46–65.
  5. García-Caparrós P., De Filippis L., Gul A., Hasanuzzaman M., Ozturk M., Altay V., Lao M.T. Oxidative stress and antioxidant metabolism under adverse environmental conditions: A review. Botanical Review. 2021; 87: 421–466.
  6. Kesawat M.S., Satheesh N., Kherawat B.S., Kumar A., Kim H.U., Chung S.M., Kumar M. Regulation of reactive oxygen species during salt stress in plants and their crosstalk with other signaling molecules—current perspectives and future directions. Plants. 2023;12: 864.
  7. Dumanović J., Nepovimova E., Natić M., Kuča K., Jaćević V. The significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense system in plants: A Concise Overview. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 552969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.552969
  8. Mittler R., Zilinskas B.A. Purification and characterization of pea cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. Plant Physiology. 1991; 97: 962-968.
  9. Pan Y., Wu L.J., Yu Z.L. Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch). Plant Growth Regulation. 2006; 49: 157-165.
  10. Bowler C., Montagu M.V., Inzé D. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 1992; 43: 83–116.
  11. Ru C., Hu X., Chen D., Wang W., Zhen J. Photosynthetic, antioxidant activities, and osmoregulatory responses in winter wheat differ during the stress and recovery periods under heat, drought, and combined stress. Plant Sci. 2023; 327: 111557.
  12. Allen R.G., Pereira R.G., Raes L.S., Smith D. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 1998; 56, FAO, no. 56, p. 300.
  13. Arnon D.I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 1949;24: 1- 15.
  14. Mita S., Murano N., Akaike M., Nakamura K. Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana with pleiotropic effects on the expression of the gene for β‐amylase and on the accumulation of anthocyanin that are inducible by sugars. Plant J. 1997;11: 841-851.
  15. Beauchamp C., Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry. 1971; 44: 276-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8
  16. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil. 1973; 39: 205–207.
  17. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology. 1984;105: 121-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3
  18. Maehly A.C., Chance B. The assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods of Biochemical Analysis. 1954; 1:357-424.
  19. Kaur S., Tiwari V., Kumari A., Chaudhary E., Sharma A., Ali U., Garg M. Protective and defensive role of anthocyanins under plant abiotic and biotic stresses: An emerging application in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Biotechnology. 2023; 361: 12-29.
  20. Cirillo V., D’Amelia V., Esposito M., Amitrano C., Carillo P., Carputo D., Maggio A. Anthocyanins are key regulators of drought stress tolerance in tobacco. Biology. 2021; 10: 139-151.
  21. Ashraf M., Harris P.J.C. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 2004; 166: 3–16.
  22. Sharma P., Jha A.B., Dubey R.S., Pessarakli M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Botany. 2012; 217037.
  23. Sarker U., Oba S. Catalase, superoxide dismutase and ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes confer drought tolerance of Amaranthus tricolor. Scientific reports. 2018; 8: 16496.
  24. Farooq M., Wahid A., Kobayashi N., Fujita D., Basra S.M.A. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2009; 29:185–212.
  25. Wang W., Zheng W., Lv H., Liang B., Jin S., Li J., Zhou W. Animal-derived plant biostimulant alleviates drought stress by regulating photosynthesis, osmotic adjustment, and antioxidant systems in tomato plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 2022; 305: 111365.
  26. Wang X., Liu H., Yu F., Hu B., Jia Y., Sha H., Zhao H. Differential activity of the antioxidant defense system and alterations in the accumulation of osmolyte and reactive oxygen species under drought stress and recovery in rice (Oryza sativa L.) tillering. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9: 8543.
  27. Razzaq M., Akram N.A., Ashraf M., Naz H., Al-Qurainy F. Interactive effect of drought and nitrogen on growth, some key physiological attributes and oxidative defense system in carrot (Daucus carota L.) plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 2017;225: 373-379.
  28. Ren J., Sun L.N., Zhang Q.Y., Song X.S. Drought tolerance is correlated with the activity of antioxidant enzymes in Cerasus humilis Seedlings. BioMed Res International. 2016; 9851095.
  29. Mhamdi A., Queval G., Chaouch S., Vanderauwera S., Breusegem F.V., Noctor G. Catalase function in plants: A focus on Arabidopsis mutants as stress-mimic models. J. Experimental Botany. 2010; 61: 4197–4220.
  30. Snider J.L., Oosterhuis D.M., Skulman B.W., Kawakami E.M. Heat stress-induced limitations to reproductive success in Gossypium hirsutum. Physiologia Plantarum. 2009; 137: 125–138.
  31. Khormali A., Savadkohi F., Oskoueiyan R., Mehregan I., Mousavizadeh S.J. Multivariate Analysis of Asparagus Antioxidant Properties in Relation to Environmental Factors. J. Veget. Sci. 2020;4(1): 99-112.
Journal of Medicinal plants and By-Products
Volume 13, Special
November 2024
Pages 835-846

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics