Effect of Different Concentrations of Phytohormones on Callus Induction in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Department of Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Chemistry, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran

Abstract

Herbal secondary metabolites possess high economic value, and the chemical synthesis of these metabolites is typically complex and costly. In light of this, the production of metabolites through various biotechnological methods, including plant cell and tissue culture, can offer a beneficial alternative. In this experiment, corm explants of saffron were collected from the Torbat-e Heydarieh, a native Iranian ecotype. After sterilization, they were cultured in ½ MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of NAA, IBA, and/or 2,4-D in combination with the BAP hormone at 21 °C under dark conditions. The experiment followed a completely randomized design with three repetitions for hormones and their levels. The findings revealed that, among the various callus induction media tested, the ½ MS medium, when supplemented with 0.5 mg/l of 2,4-D and 0.1 mg/l of BAP, demonstrated the highest percentage of callus formation. Meanwhile, the ½ MS medium with hormone combinations of 0.5 mg/l of BAP and 2 mg/l of IBA resulted in the lowest callusing. On the other hand, although NAA was effective for callus induction, the rooting percentage of calli is higher and is not suitable for callus induction or the establishment of suspension culture in saffron.
Abbreviations: 2,4-D; 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, NAA; 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid, IBA; Indole-3-butyric acid, BAP; 6-Benzylaminopurine, MS; Murashige and Skoog medium

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Sofowora A., Ogunbodede E., Onayade A. The role and place of medicinal plants in the strategies for disease prevention. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med: AJTCAM. 2013; 10(5): 210-229.
  2. Kashtwari M., Wani A.A., Dhar M.K., Jan S., Kamili A.N. Development of an efficient in vitro mutagenesis protocol for genetic improvement of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Physiol. Mol. Boil. Plants: Int. J. Func. plant boil. 2018; 24(5): 951-962.
  3. Ozyigit I.I., Dogan I., Hocaoglu-Ozyigit A., Yalcin B., Erdogan A., Yalcin I.E., Cabi E., Kaya Y. Production of secondary metabolites using tissue culture-based biotechnological applications. Front. Plant. sci. 2023; 14, 1132555.
  4. Chib S., Thangaraj A., Kaul S., Dhar M.K., Kaul T. Development of a system for efficient callus production, somatic embryogenesis and gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Plant methods. 2020; 16: 47.
  5. Sharafi A., Azadi P., Bagheri K., Gholami M., Mirmasoumi M., Moradi A., Thin Cell Layer, a Suitable Explant for In vitro Regeneration of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). J. Agr. Sci. Tech., (JAST). 2017; 19: 1429-1435.
  6. Bagheri K., Azadi P., Gholami M., Mir Masoumi, M. Effect of some plant growth regulators and different explants types on callus induction in saffron. Saffron Agronomy and Technology (JSAT). 2017; 5(3): 231-239.
  7. Raspor M., Motyka V., Kaleri A.R., Ninković S., Tubić L., Cingel A., Ćosić, T. Integrating the Roles for Cytokinin and Auxin in De Novo Shoot Organogenesis: From Hormone Uptake to Signaling Outputs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021; 22(16), 8554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168554
  8. Küçükrecep A., Tekdal D., Akça İ., Çetiner S., Hatipoğlu R. Callus Induction from Unpollinated Ovary Explants of Beans. Intech. Open. 2022; doi: 10.5772/intechopen.100392
  9. Wahyuni D.K., Huda A., Faizah S., Purnobasuki H., Wardojo B.P.E. Effects of light, sucrose concentration and repetitive subculture on callus growth and medically important production in Justicia gendarussa Burm.f. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2020; 27:e00473. doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00473. PMID: 32612941; PMCID: PMC7321969.
  10. Eisa E.A., Tilly-Mándy A., Honfi P., Shala, A.Y., Gururani, M. A. Chrysanthemum: A Comprehensive Review on Recent Developments on In Vitro Regeneration. Biology, 2022; 11(12), 1774.
  11. Arab M.M., Yadollahi A., Shojaeiyan A., Shokri S., Maleki Ghojah S., Effects of nutrient media, different cytokinin types and their concentrations on in vitro multiplication of G×N15 (hybrid of almond×peach) vegetative rootstock, J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2014; 12(2): 81-87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2014.10.001.
  12. Ikeuchi M., Sugimoto K., Iwase A. Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. The Plant cell. 2013; 25(9): 3159–3173.
  13. Schaller G.E., Bishopp A., Kieber J.J. The yin-yang of hormones: cytokinin and auxin interactions in plant development. The Plant cell. 2015; 27(1): 44-63.
  14. Fan Y., Tang Z., Wei J., Yu X., Guo H., Li T., Guo H., Zhang L., Fan Y., Zhang C., Zeng F. Dynamic Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Complex Regulatory Pathway Underlying Induction and Dose Effect by Different Exogenous Auxin IAA and 2,4-D During in vitro Embryogenic Redifferentiation in Cotton. Front. Plant Sci. 2022; 13:931105.
  15. Dar S.A., Nawchoo I.A., Tyub S., Kamili A.N. Effect of plant growth regulators on in vitro induction and maintenance of callus from leaf and root explants of Atropa acuminata Royal ex Lindl. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2021; 32:e00688.
  16. Sharafzadeh S., Khosh-Khui M. Effects of Precooling and Growth Regulators on Micropropagation of Estahban Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Iran. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. (in Persian with English Abstract). 2004; 5: 129-136.
  17. Ramandi A., Qolizadegan A., Seifi A., Optimization of callus formation and cell suspension culture in saffron. J. Saffron res. 1401; 10(2): 276-284.
  18. Safarnejad A., Alamdari S.B.L., Darroudi H., Dalir M. The Effect of Different Hormones on Callus Induction, Regeneration and Multiplication of Saffron (Crocus Sativus L.) Corms, Saffron Agronomy & Technol. 2016; 4(2): 143-154. DOI: 10.22048/jsat.2016.17364
  19. Parray J.A., Kamili A.N., Hamid R., Husaini A.M. In vitro cormlet production of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) and their flowering response under greenhouse. Genetically Modified Crop and Food. 2012; 3(4): 289-295.